F03.01
What the source actually records
The surviving description is compact and severe. The Tell Tale Signatories of the Final Doomrite are “slightly more MTA-aligned” than the Fragmentsectarians, and they are named as the attackers in the fire-bombing of the Bleecker Street compound. The source does not provide a manifesto, ranks or a complete institutional history.
Their long form name binds three archives together: Tell Tale Signs, the bureaucratic act of signing, and the terminal ritual of the Doomrite. The name is preserved because it carries the coalition’s whole pressure—outtake evidence drawn into administrative finality—without requiring an invented constitution.
F03.02
Canon under temporal government
The larger record explains why a version dispute can become a security matter. In the stopped interval, an alternate tempo or excluded song is evidence that another relation between past and future once existed. An authority committed to a settled chronology therefore has reason to narrow which arrangement may be heard as law.
Ron’s prohibition of the uptempo Not Dark Yet belongs to this same canon climate, though the papers do not attribute that decree directly to the Signatories. The example establishes the stakes without assigning them an undocumented act: arrangement can be governed because arrangement changes the permissible mood of the future.
F03.03
The violence of a uniform edition
The Realisticonflagration literalizes the analogy to a uniform Bible. If rival Fragments remain active, a single authorised chronology cannot close. The Signatories answer plurality with an attempt to destroy the people and place in which it is maintained.
Nothing in the source says the attack succeeds in resolving the canon. The continued existence of the term Fragmentsectarian, the surviving dossiers and the archive’s own competing versions instead show that finality has to be repeatedly enforced and never becomes self-evident.